|
|
|
XIII. 2004 LERA BEST DISSERTATION
COMPETITION
Three Essays on Labor Policy
Christopher Riddell
Queen's University
Chapter 1
Union Certification Success under Voting versus Card-Check Procedures:
Evidence from British Columbia, 1978¿1998
The first chapter of the dissertation examines the impact of mandatory
election laws on certification success using data on private sector certification
attempts from British Columbia over the 1978 to 1998 period. The paper
exploits a unique natural experiment. Prior to 1984, British Columbia had
the traditional Canadian card-check system, in which the union can be certi-
fied without an election if it signs up a sufficient proportion of the proposed
bargaining unit.1 In 1984, a mandatory election system was introduced in
which a secret-ballot vote was required if the minimum threshold was signed
up. The election system was repealed in 1993 and replaced with the original
card-check procedure. Moreover, by exploiting the timing of various legislative
changes that occurred over the sample period, the effect of mandatory
voting can be isolated from other legislative changes.2 The paper then examines
the role of management opposition across the two different union recognition
procedures.3
In general, mandatory election laws are believed to lead to lower certifi-
cation success rates for two reasons: (1) management has more opportunity
to oppose the bid in a voting system; and (2) peer-pressure from pro-union
colleagues and union organizers may artificially inflate the "true" level of
support in a card-check system. With respect to management opposition, a change in the union recognition law may have two effects: (1) the effectiveness4
of management opposition may change; and (2) the incidence5 of management
opposition may change.
Figure 1 shows success rates for the private and "public" sectors, with withdrawn
certifications and raids excluded.6 The pattern in Figure 1 is striking.
Success rates for private sector organizing drives fell by nearly 20 percentage
points following the introduction of mandatory elections in May 1984. Moreover,
in 1993, success rates appear to have recovered to their prevoting levels
and remained as such through the remainder of the sample period. It is interesting
that public sector success rates did not systematically decline.7
Econometric analysis that exploits the timing of various changes in legislation
suggests that mandatory elections alone can account for the entire
decline in private sector success rates. The other major issue addressed in
the paper is the role of management opposition. I estimate the impact of
unfair labor practices on certification success over the 1987¿1998 period,
which covers one card-check regime and one mandatory election regime.8 In
addition, I use a decomposition procedure to provide some evidence as to
how much of the fall in success rates associated with the voting regime can
be attributed to a change in the incidence of management opposition and
how much can be attributed to a change in the effectiveness of management
opposition. Overall, the central results are as follows: (1) management opposition
is, at least, twice as effective under an election system; (2) there is no
difference in the incidence of management opposition across the different
union recognition regimes; and (3) management opposition can account for
25 percent of the decline in success rates.9
Chapter 2
Welfare Checks and Health Outcomes
The second chapter examines the impact of the distribution of welfare
checks on the health outcomes of drug users. The relationship between
social assistance and substance abuse has been a topic of much debate in the
United States, where, in 1996, Public Law 104-121 terminated Supplemental
Security Income and Social Security Disability Income for recipients with
a primary diagnosis related to substance abuse. The rationale for the law was
a belief that such recipients were spending the money on drugs and alcohol
such that welfare was effectively "aiding and abetting addiction" (Cohen
1994). Canadian law rarely makes special provisions for substance abuse.10
A few studies in the public health literature have shown evidence of socalled
check effects„that is, a relationship between the day welfare checks are
released and subsequent increases in outcomes such as hospital admissions,
drug-related fatalities, and 9-1-1 calls (see Riddell and Riddell 2005). In
addition, economists have examined the relationship between identifiable,
preannounced income changes and consumption. One such study directly
tests for a consumption-related check effect among welfare recipients and
finds that the probability and amount of daily expenditures increases
markedly on the day of check arrival (Stephens 2003).
This paper contributes to the check effect literature by conducting a
unique test using hospital admissions data on injection drug users (IDUs)
from the Canadian city of Vancouver.11 The paper addresses the question of
whether drug users are more likely to leave the hospital against medical
advice (AMA)„thereby interrupting their treatment„on the day that welfare
checks are released. Check day is linked to drug consumption by examining
drug overdose admissions. In particular, I test whether individuals
induced to leave AMA by "Welfare Wednesday" are more likely to be readmitted
with a drug overdose.12
From a theoretical perspective, the possible relationship between welfare
checks and drug consumption has various components. One component
is the pure income effect story. On the basis of Cohen's findings (1994), it is
clear that the 1997 change in U.S. law was predicated on the notion that terminating
SSI/DI benefits may lead to reduced drug consumption. To date, I
am unaware of any study that has convincingly examined the income effect
side of the substance use-welfare debate. Indeed, I am unable to test directly
for income effects in this paper, because I do not observe an individual's benefit
level. In this paper, I address the question of whether the distribution of
welfare payments affects the distribution of drug consumption over time. On
the basis of the addiction literature, there are two key reasons why I anticipate
a spike in drug consumption„or "binging"„in the days following welfare
day: (1) the neurophysiology of intravenous cocaine use and, to a lesser
extent, intravenous heroin use;13 and (2) environmental cues.14
Figure 2 shows the distribution of discharges (AMA discharges relative to
planned discharges, which together equal total discharges) over the sample
period. A clear spike is observed on the day welfare checks are released. The
results from econometric analysis confirm that individuals induced to leave
AMA by Welfare Wednesday are readmitted to the hospital much sooner than
other patients and are more likely to be readmitted with a drug overdose.
Chapter 3
The Long-Run Effect of Unemployment Insurance: A Study of Maine and
New Brunswick, 1940¿1991
The final chapter examines the long-run impact of unemployment insurance.
Existing studies of the labor market effects of income support programs
focus mainly on short-term responses to policy changes.15 It is not surprising
that some critics have argued that such studies may dramatically understate
the long-term effects of these programs. Over a longer time horizon, individuals
have the ability to make larger adjustments in their behavior and
adjust on a wider number of margins, in some cases effectively building a
"lifestyle" around the programs in question.
This paper attempts to measure the long-term effects of large-scale
changes in income support policy by taking advantage of a natural experiment.
This experiment results from the fact that a national border„between
New Brunswick and Maine„divides a region with a relatively homogenous
population and resource endowment but that experienced dramatically different
changes in income support policy. By 1940, Maine had a modest
unemployment insurance (UI) system but New Brunswick had none. After
that, New Brunswick's system grew much more rapidly, to the point where
New Brunswick's system in 1980¿1990 was astonishingly generous to workers
with very short work histories. Using the five decennial censuses spanning
the period 1940¿1991, the paper exploits the comparison between
these two jurisdictions over time to estimate the long-term effects of UI program
parameters on labor market outcomes.16
The focus in this paper is on the incidence of part-year work among
workers and has two main components. The first component uses grouped
cell-level census data for the entire 1940¿1991 period. A unit of observation
here is an industry-gender-region-year cell; for each such cell I calculate the
fraction of persons working part-year (defined here as less than forty weeks),
and analyze its responsiveness to the relative income of part- versus full-year
workers in that cell, as determined by prevailing wage rates and UI program
rules. The second component estimates the entire distribution of annual
work weeks using census microdata from the three decades, 1970¿1991, for
which it is available in both regions.
The results show that men in Maine and New Brunswick had a similar,
high incidence of part-year work in 1940; however, whereas men's part-year
work significantly declined over the next five decades in Maine, it did not in
New Brunswick. This raises the possibility that, for men, the Canadian UI
system may have preserved a "way of life" that has become largely extinct in
Maine. Among women, part-year work was substantially less common in
New Brunswick than Maine in 1940; by 1990 this pattern had been dramatically
reversed as a result of growth in New Brunswick and decline in Maine.
For women, Canadian UI may thus have created a new pattern of part-year
labor force participation that would not otherwise have existed.
The empirical findings provide strong support for the hypothesis that UI
has played a key role in the divergence in part-year work between the two regions. For instance, the results indicate that, for men, the 1972 reforms
alone can account for nearly 60 percent of the change in part-year work that
occurred over the 1960¿1990 period. It is interesting to note that, although a
substantial share of the divergence in part-year work between these two
regions is attributable to Canada's 1972 UI reforms, the analysis shows that
Canada's introduction of generous "seasonal benefits" in the 1950s also plays
an important role. Because earlier studies have not always accounted for
these benefits (which are hard to characterize), such studies overestimate the
size of Canada's policy change in 1972 thereby underestimating the effects of
changes in UI program parameters at that time.
Notes
1. The proportion required to avoid an election varies by province, but generally has
ranged between 50 percent and 55 percent. Although it is possible for a certification bid to
require a vote in a card-check province, the reality is that few organizing drives go to an
election. Historically, all Canadian provinces, except Nova Scotia since 1977, have had
"card-check" procedures, but this has changed with an increasing number of provinces
going the election route over the past decade. In addition, over the 1984¿1998 period,
union density fell by about 7 percentage points in Canada„similar to the 8 percentage
point decline in the United States during the same years (Riddell and Riddell 2004). Many
observers believe that the recent decline of both unions and the card-check system is no
coincidence.
2. Three legislative changes were made to the British Columbia Labour Code over
the sample period of October 1978 to May 1998 (see Riddell 2004 for a detailed analysis).
The first, when mandatory elections were introduced, was in 1984. Unlike many legislative
packages passed in Canada that included mandatory elections, the 1984 amendment made
very few changes to the Labour Code. Second, in 1987, sweeping changes were made to
the code when the Industrial Relations Reform Act was introduced. Finally, in 1993,
mandatory elections were repealed. Many of the "voting era" amendments, however, were
maintained.
3. The only previous paper that has isolated the effect of mandatory elections is Johnson
(2002), who finds that elections reduce certification success by 9 percentage points.
For the United States, Easton and Kriesky (2001) find some evidence that success rates
are higher in cases decided by card-check relative to elections
4. A voting regime may increase the effectiveness of employer tactics for two reasons.
First, the amount of time that employers have to influence the organizing drive is unambiguously
greater in the voting system. In the Canadian card-check system union organizers
collect signatures from members of the proposed bargaining unit, and then make an
application. In British Columbia, it is rare for a union in one of the card-check regimes to
fail to gather 55 percent support„sufficient for certification without a vote. The employer
is contacted when the BC Labour Relations Board (BCLRB) conducts its investigation of
the petition requirements. Thus, under card-check many organizing drives are virtually
complete before the employer is aware of the drive. Under voting, unions still gather cards, but then a secret ballot vote is held. This extra step in the certification process gives
the employer greater opportunity to launch a campaign. Second, management opposition
is likely to be more effective in a voting regime because of the secret ballot vote itself.
Under card-checks, if the employer coerces employees into refusing to sign cards, union
organizers and pro-union colleagues can counteract the coercion tactics. In a secret ballot
vote, the opportunity to counteract employer threats is likely diminished.
5. If the effectiveness of management opposition is greater in a voting regime„and
employers know this„a cost-benefit calculation implies that employers will adopt such
tactics more frequently given that the chances of defeating the bid are greater while the
costs remain the same. As well, there is simply more time available to the employer under
elections. Thus, those employers in a card-check system who did not realize organizing
activity was occurring until after the cards had been collected would have an opportunity
to oppose the union in a voting system.
6. A large majority of the social services certifications are public sector, but a few
from health services are private sector and, unfortunately, cannot be isolated.
7. This finding is suggestive of an explanation based on management opposition,
because employer resistance to certification is likely to be negligible in the public sector
due to concerns over public image and the lack of profit maximization objectives, management
opposition (particularly egregious management opposition) is likely to be negligible
in the public sector.
8. Another issue is the potential endogeneity of ULPs (i.e., if the employer believes
success is contestable and can be influenced, they are more likely to pursue an anti-union
campaign compared to situations where success is very likely or very unlikely). Instrumental
variable regressions are estimated to account for this potential endogeneity. Overall,
the findings are similar. The results imply that standard ULP estimates are biased
toward zero.
9. This result may understate the effect of election laws and management opposition
on union organizing in a broader context. First, the number of certification attempts fell
by around 50 percent following the 1984 law. Second, no evidence is provided on first contract
success. Both of these issues are being addressed in future research.
10. Income assistance laws are under provincial jurisdiction in Canada. Our reading
of the provincial laws for the five largest provinces is that only Ontario (in a legislative
change made in 1997) has a strong restriction on collecting disability support if dependent
on (or addicted to) alcohol or drugs (see subsections 2 and 3 of section 5, part 1 of the
Ontario Disability Support Program Act). The Ontario law, however, is not as restrictive as
the U.S. law because an individual with an addiction can remain eligible for benefits if they
have a "substantial physical or mental impairment" (see subsection 3), which would generally
include HIV/AIDS and various psychiatric conditions, both of which are common
among the injection drug users in our data.
11. The drug use situation in Vancouver is dire. In 1993 drug overdoses from heroin
became the leading cause of death among men 30¿49 years of age (see Riddell and Riddell
2005 for complete discussion and references). Through the 1990s, Vancouver has consistently
had the highest overall levels of overdose deaths in Canada with more than 300 in 1998 alone and more than 2,000 between 1991 and 1998. According to a statement by the
British Columbia general coroner, Vancouver's overdose death rate is "very likely" the
highest in North America. The incidence rate of HIV infection among Vancouver's injection
drug users is conservatively estimated to be 25 percent, with some articles in the
media quoting a rate as high as 50 percent. Even with the conservative estimates, Vancouver
is widely believed to have one of the highest levels of HIV infection among injection
drug users in North America and similar to cities such as New York and Bangkok.
12. Welfare checks are distributed once a month in the province of British Columbia,
usually on the last Wednesday.
13. The more rapid a drug's onset of action the greater the euphoria users experience
and the more they "like" the drug. Cocaine and heroine„particularly when used intravenously„
are especially rapid in their delivery to the brain. Moreover, in the case of
cocaine, the rate of removal from the brain is extremely fast. This is believed to be a key
reason why individuals who become addicted to cocaine tend to move toward a "bingeand-
crash" pattern of use, in addition to moving from intranasal and smoking administration
toward intravenous use.
14. Research in both the psychology and neuroscience fields has found that consumption„
particularly drug consumption„may be linked to certain environmental cues
(see Laibson 2001 for a review of these literatures). This notion implies that, once a culture
of drug use has been established„such as in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver„
it would be very difficult for a user to resist drug use once exposed to that culture, even if
their intention was not to use drugs. Indeed, Welfare Wednesday itself may have become
an environmental cue.
15. Of course, for a variety of reasons, the long-term effects of income support programs
are much harder to measure than short-term effects. One reason is that large-scale
changes in such programs tend only to be made at the national level. As a result, a "control
group" is typically not available to indicate what might have happened in the absence of a
policy change. Identification of long-term effects in nonexperimental studies is further
hampered by the greater leeway for confounding variables such as macroeconomic conditions
to change over longer periods„problems that can be avoided in short-term studies
using, for example, a regression-discontinuity design. Experimental studies, which solve
the control group problem via random assignment, tend to be very limited in duration and
to focus on small variations in program parameters.
16. One paper that examines long-term effects of income assistance is Meyer and
Rosenbaum (2001), who study the longer-run effects of reforms to the welfare system and
the earned income tax credit, with women without children as a control group for those
much more affected by these policy changes„women with children. A necessary feature
of studies like Meyer and Rosenbaum's is the use of a control group that is drawn from the
same economy as the "treatment" group. As a result, their estimates are likely contaminated
by general equilibrium effects of policy changes. Further, the control group, of
necessity, is demographically different from the treatment group (e.g., childless women
versus mothers), and it is not clear that the maintained assumption of identical policy
effects on both groups is plausible. The prospect of using the same demographic groups in similar neighboring regional economies over long periods of time, and in the presence of
large differential changes in income support programs thus provides an important new
perspective in estimating the effects of social policy changes.
References
Cohen, W. (1994) "Tax Dollars Aiding and Abetting Addiction: Social Security Disability
and SSI Cash Benefits to Drug Addicts and Alcoholics." Report of the Senate Special
Committee on Aging and Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of Government
Management. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Eaton, Adrienne E., and Jill Kiesky. 2001. "Union Organizing under Neutrality and Card
Check Agreements." Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 55, no. 1, pp.
42¿59.
Johnson, Susan. 2002. "Voting or Card-Check: How the Union Recognition Procedure
Affects Organizing Success." Economic Journal, Vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 344¿61.
Laibson, David. 2001. "A Cue-Theory of Consumption." Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 81¿119.
Meyer, Bruce, and D. Rosenbaum. 2001. "Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and
the Labor Supply of Single Mothers." Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, no.
3, pp. 1063¿114.
Riddell, Chris. 2004. "Union Certification Success under Voting versus Card-Check Procedures:
Evidence from British Columbia, 1978¿1998." Industrial and Labor Relations
Review, Vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 493¿517.
Riddell, Chris, and W. Craig Riddell. 2004. "Changing Patterns of Unionization: the North
American Experience." In Thomas A. Kochan and Anil Verma, eds., Unions in the
21st Century: An International Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Riddell, Chris, and Rosemarie Riddell. 2005. "Welfare Checks, Drug Consumption and
Health." Journal of Human Resources, forthcoming.
Stephens, Melvin. 2003. "'3rd of Tha Month': Do Social Security Recipients Smooth Consumption
between Checks.' American Economic Review, Vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 406¿22.
.
|