|
|
|
III. LERA REFEREED PAPERS: LABOR MARKET ECONOMICS AND WORK AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS
The Diffusion and Decline of Employee Involvement Policies in U.S.
Manufacturing Plants
Wei Chi Tsinghua
University
Richard
Freeman Harvard
University
Morris
Kleiner University of Minnesota
Abstract
The study examines trends
of employee involvement (EI) practices in U.S. manufacturing establishments.
The data from a national survey show that although EI use in the establishments
has increased considerably during the period from 1986 to 1995, some companies
terminated EI after using it for several years. The results suggest that EI
use is correlated with a company's business strategy, management style, and
other HR programs such as training and incentive compensation. An implication
of these results suggests that estimates that show positive impacts of high
performance workplace practices also should consider plants that use these
policies and then abandon them.
Introduction
One of the most visible and widely discussed human resources policies
in American business has been the development of employee involvement (EI)
programsÑa diverse set of personnel and human resources management (HRM) practices
that give workers more authority at workplaces and promote their involvement
in business decision-making processes. These practices include, for example,
total quality management (TQM), self-directed work teams, and suggestion systems.
The major findings by Freeman and Rogers (1999) showed that voice through
employee involvement programs is the most sought-after policy by American
workers. The Presidential Commission on the Future of Worker Management Relations,
often referred to as the Dunlop Commission, lists employee involvement as
one of its main recommendations for improving the quality of work life and
U.S. productivity (Commission on the Future of Worker Management Relations,
19931994).
Previous studies have mainly
focused on two issues: who adopted EI policies and the impact of EI on organizational-level
outcomes. The findings showed that EI adopters are often organizations
that operate in competitive product markets and have to respond to the market
quickly and flexibly. In addition, they use new technology that requires
highly skilled workers and follow a business strategy that emphasizes quality
and innovation rather than low cost. In general, adopters have complementary
HR practices such as high levels of training and incentive compensation plans
(Osterman 1994, 2000; Arthur 1992; Ichniowski and Shaw 1995; Pil and MacDuffie
1996; Dunlop and Weil 1996; Gittleman, Horrigan, and Joyce 1998). Although
EI programs have been increasing, these policies have not been universally
successful. One detailed econometric case study in aircraft manufacturing
shows that firms also have chosen to abandon these policies (Kleiner,
Leonard, and Pilarski 2002). Unlike most other studies, we examine the abandonment
as well as the adoption of EI. We use data that cover ten years of information
on human resources and business strategies from manufacturing establishments.
Consistent with other analysis, our data show that EI use has been rapidly
increasing in establishments during this period. However, we find that
EI use has also declined in some establishments.
Data
The National Bureau of Economic Research's Human Resources Management
Survey was used to collect the data that we use in this study. The survey
was collected through detailed on-site interviews, usually involving a team
of researchers. From 1995 through 1997 the survey team paid visits to the
plants. During the visits, which often included multiple return trips over
several days, the survey team collected written documents that the plant was
willing to share to obtain knowledge about business environment, technology,
and production of the plants; the team also interviewed managers, workers,
and union representatives.
The survey asked questions about the plants' recruiting and selection,
training, performance evaluation, employee involvement, and financial
participation practices, as well as business strategy, management style,
and basic information about the plant. For HR programs managers were asked
whether the plant had adopted a certain program since 1986. If the plant had
adopted a program, managers were asked which year it was adopted and whether
the program was still in use; if the plant had not adopted a program, managers
were asked in which year the program was terminated. Specifically, selection
and staffing programs include whether the company had a detailed screening
process, personal interview, aptitude test, physical exam, reference check,
and probationary period. Training programs include whether the company offered
on-the-job training, training in team building, on-site training, and tuition
reimbursement. Performance appraisal policies include whether the company
used assessment centers, formal review sessions, and a standardized form to
evaluate their employees periodically. Employee involvement and communication
practices include whether the company adopted job rotation, a suggestion system,
Quality of Work Life (QWL), Quality Circles (QC), total quality management
(TQM), self-managed work teams, job redesign, a joint labor-management committee,
and employee representation on the board of directors. Finally, financial
participation programs include whether the company adopted an individual incentive
plan, employee stock ownership (ESOP), cash or deferred profit sharing,
gain sharing, skill-based pay, an employee stock purchase plan, and a group
bonus.
Managers interviewed also
were asked whether there had been changes in the plant manager/production
leader since 1986 and, if yes, how many. Then the management style of each
manager was rated on a 1 to 5 scale with 1 representing "close monitoring"
and 5 representing "gives employee autonomy." Four categories of business
strategy were included in the survey: growth of the market share of the firm,
obtain a specific market niche, short-term profit maximization,
and maximizing shareholder value of the firm. The emphasis of the current
manager on each of the four strategies was rated on a 1 to 5 scale with 1
indicating "a little" and 5 being "a great deal." Managers were also asked
whether the plant had undergone major restructuring since 1986 and, if yes,
which year. All of the above responses were converted to yearly observations.
The basic information about plants was time constant. The questions included
which year the plant was built, whether the company had union representation,
and the estimated average yearly turnover rate. Although the questionnaire
required retrospective answers, the research team asked for documentation
on the adoption and termination of each policy.
The Rise and Fall of EI Use
As can be seen in Table 1, in 1986, at the beginning of the period
covered by the survey, 76 percent of the plants in our sample had adopted
some EI programs. By 1995 this number had increased to 96 percent. The number
of companies using a "bundle of programs" also greatly increased. Even in
1986 the percentage of plants that adopted two or more programs was 55 percent,
and this increased to over 90 percent by 1995. The most common forms of EI
policies for the establishments in our sample are joint labor-management committees
along with suggestion systems. Worker participation on corporate boards and
self-managed teams are the two least-used forms of EI, which suggests that
a small percentage of establishments have evolved to a high level of employee
involvement (Freeman, Kleiner, and Ostroff 2000).
Although the trend was toward
increasing EI, during some periods the percentage of companies and the extent
of EI use declined. The downward trend was caused by the termination of programs.
In Table 2 we show the number of companies adopting or terminating programs
by year. The table shows that the diffusion of EI sped up after 1990. In general,
termination of EI programs is less frequent than adopting new programs. QC
and TQM are the two programs that have most frequently been terminated, suggesting
that these two programs may be less effective or that other programs may be
substituting for them. A substantial number of terminations occurred between
1988 and 1991, which was a downturn in the business cycle, suggesting that
financial difficulties may lead companies to abandon some EI programs
in order to cut labor costs.
Correlations of EI Use
with Business Strategy, Management Style, and other HR Programs
In this section we examine the interaction of EI rise and decline
with other factors such as business strategy, management style, and training,
selection, and other HR programs. We develop the two measures of EI useÑsummated
rating measure and Rasch measure. The summated rating value equals the total
number of EI programs that a company adopted in a year. The Rasch measure
is estimated based on the Rasch model. Some EI programs are more difficult
to implement than others. Two plants who adopt the same number of EI programs
but different ones would have a different level of EI use. For example, self-managed
work teams are a more autonomous form of work teams than TQM or QC. In self-managed
teams, employees have more discretion and authority. They are delegated the
right to make decisions and implement them, and they are responsible for
the outcomes. In QC and TQM workers may provide suggestions to managers on
quality- or work-related issues, but they generally do not have authority
to act on their own. Thus, a plant that adopted self-managed teams should
be considered to have a higher level of EI than one that adopted QC or TQM.
The advantage of the Rasch model is that it estimates the extent of EI use
in companies while taking into account differences in the difficulty
level of the programs.
The Rasch model regards the probability that a plant has a certain
program as a function of plant and EI policy characteristics:



Estimates from our sample show that the average EI use based on
Rasch and summated rating are highly correlated. The average correlation across
years is 0.64 for the two measures of employee involvement.
Examining the correlation
estimates between EI, business strategy, management style, and other HR programs
such as training, performance appraisal, and incentive compensation shows
that a company's EI use is significantly correlated with management
style, business strategy, and other HR practice. EI use is positively associated
with managers' emphasis on giving employees autonomy and on strategies such
as growth of market share and niche market. It is also positively correlated
with the use of training and incentive compensation. This suggests the importance
of complementarity between EI and these other HR programs.
Summary and Conclusion
Using ten-year longitudinal
data of establishments, we show that EI use is not necessarily a stable phenomenon.
It has spurts of growth and decline, as do other labor market institutions
within firms. Although other studies have investigated the determinants
of EI adoption, few studies have examined the trend of EI decline. Our study
calls attention to the termination of employee voice policies in manufacturing
plants. This is particularly important in the determination of the importance
of high-performance workplace practices on firm performance because
almost all studies focus only on the adoption of these policies. This flaw
in the research design is likely to bias upwards the estimates of the importance
of EI and related policies on firm performance. Future research should
adjust for the bias in analyzing firm performance. In addition, we estimate
correlations between EI, business strategy, management style, and other HR
programs. The results suggest that management style, business strategy, and
complementarity between EI and other HR programs may influence a company's
use of EI.
References
Arthur, Jeffrey. 1992. "The
Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American
Steel Minimills." Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 488506.
Commission on the Future of
Worker Management Relations. 1994. FactFinding Report. Washington, D.C.: US Department
of Labor, June 2. [http://www.dol.gov/asp/ programs/history/reich/reports/dunlop/dunlop.htm].
Dunlop, John T., and David
Weil. 1996. "Diffusion and Performance of Modular Production in the U.S.
Apparel Industry." Industrial Relations, Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 33455.
Freeman, Richard B., Morris
M. Kleiner, and Cheri Ostroff. 2000. "The Anatomy of Employee Involvement
and Its Effects on Firms and Workers." NBER Working Paper 8050, December.
Freeman, Richard B., and Joel
Rogers. 1999. What Workers Want. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gittleman, Maury, Michael
Horrigan, and Mary Joyce. 1998. "'Flexible' Workplace Practices: Evidence
from a Nationally Representative Survey." Industrial and Labor Relations
Review, Vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 99115.
Ichniowski, Casey, and Kathryn
Shaw. 1995. "Old Dogs and New Tricks: Determinants of the Adoption of Productivity-Enhancing
Work Practices." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Social
Issue Microeconomics, pp. 165.
Kleiner, Morris M., Jonathan
S. Leonard, and Adam M. Pilarski. 2002. "How Industrial Relations Affects
Plant Performance: The Case of Commercial Aircraft Manufacturing." Industrial
and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 195218.
Osterman, Paul. 1994. "How
Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?" Industrial and Labor
Relations Review, Vol. 47, no. 2, pp.17388.
Osterman, Paul. 2000. "Work
Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects
on Employee Welfare." Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 17996.
Pil, Frits K., and John Paul
MacDuffie. 1996. "The Adoption of High-Involvement Work Practices."
Industrial Relations, Vol.
35, no. 3, pp. 42355.
Author's
address: Center for American Progress, 805 15th Street NW, Suite 400, Washington,
DC 20005
|