Submission Guidelines

Mormon Studies Review

Most contributions to the Mormon Studies Review are solicited by its editors. The timetable and guidelines for each type of contribution (Forum Essays, Review Essays, Book Reviews, and Reviews of Resources and Primary Sources) are listed below. The editors are open, on a limited basis, to considering unsolicited submissions that match the Review’s intended quality and scope. Interested authors should send an email query to MormonStudiesReview@gmail.com.

 

TIMETABLE FOR ALL SUBMISSIONS
First drafts due: April 1
Manuscripts back to authors: May 15
Final pre-copyediting drafts due: June 15
Issue printed: January 1


GUIDELINES FOR ALL SUBMISSIONS

Manuscripts should be written in Microsoft Word (doc, docx) and follow the most recent edition of The Chicago Manual of Style on capitalization, punctuation, hyphenation, numbers, quotations, and citations. For a detailed style guide, see MSR Style Guide July 2021.pdf

At the end of the essay, include a two- or three-sentence biographical blurb with your name, affiliation, and latest publication or work in progress.

Submit an electronic copy of the manuscript via email to MormonStudiesReview@gmail.com. It will then be reviewed by the Review editorial staff, and any substantive revisions will be negotiated with you at that time. Thereafter, your submission will be copyedited and sent back for your final approval.

The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not conform to the critical standards of the journal.


GUIDELINES FOR SPECIFIC TYPES OF SUBMISSIONS

FORUM ESSAYS:
Forum essays typically appear at the beginning of the Mormon Studies Review. They are designed to offer different, and at times competing, perspectives on a broader scholarly question. Contributions should offer sophisticated, nuanced, and provocative analysis that is drawn from the author’s background, outlook, and expertise. Authors are encouraged to be brief in their assessment of past work and particular examples so that most space can be dedicated to the field’s future and possibilities. Because each volume’s Forum aims to cover a single theme and there is bound to be overlap, we request that each contributor remain fairly close to the subtopic agreed upon with the Review staff. Contributions should include a brief title.

Forum essays should be between 3,000 and 3,500 words, including notes; ideal contributions come to the point quickly and develop their discussion efficiently. While critical thinking is expected, original research for Forum Essays is not mandatory.

REVIEW ESSAYS:
Review essays are often, though not always, based on one or several related books that merit an in-depth discussion or that might serve as an entry point for broader analysis. Our criteria for choosing review essay topics—content, method, perspective, originality, and significance—are evolving and flexible. Most essays are solicited, though we are open, on a limited basis, to considering unsolicited submissions that match our intended quality and scope. Interested authors should contact the Mormon Studies Review editors to explore possible review topics.

Essays should offer both a thorough summary of the book or books in question, and a critical evaluation of them in the context of existing literature. Each essay should have a title that differs from the book(s) under review and that reflects the essay’s theme and approach. Because readers of the Review come from many disciplines and backgrounds, reviewers should make it a priority to clearly explain the book’s or books’ broader significance both inside and outside its/their subfield. In most cases, the book(s) under review should be used as a touchstone from which to engage broader issues or developments within the relevant discipline(s).

Review essays should be between 3,000 and 4,000 words, including notes; reviews of a single monograph should tend toward the former limitation, and reviews of edited collections or multiple books should tend toward the latter. Because of space limitations, we expect authors to stay within their word allotment. Deviations from the suggested word count should be preauthorized by the Review editorial staff.

At the top of the manuscript, include the essay’s title, your name, and information for the book(s) under review, as in this example:
Your Name, Title of Essay; reviewing: (1) Richard Lyman Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005. 740 pp., with index. $35.00 hardcover, $18.95 paperback. (2) Reid L. Neilson and Terryl L. Givens, eds., Joseph Smith Jr.: Reappraisals after Two Centuries. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 284 pp., with index. $99.95 hardcover, $24.95 paperback.

When quoting directly from the book(s) under review, cite the page numbers in parentheses following the quotation or at the end of the sentence and before the period. When citing other works, include reference information in footnotes formatted according to the most recent edition of The Chicago Manual of Style. Please keep footnotes to a minimum. Use italics rather than underlining for emphasis and for titles of works to be set in italic type.

DISCIPLINARY ESSAYS:
Disciplinary essays aim to accomplish one of two things: first, to assess the development of a disciplinary field, as viewed through the lens of how it treats Mormonism. This approach typically works when a field has frequently, if not always consistently, utilized themes or characters from Mormonism, which allows the scholar to trace the broader contours of the field’s development. Second, the disciplinary essay may posit how a disciplinary field could integrate Mormonism, or Mormon themes, stories, or figures, into its studies in order to explore new ideas. This particular approach may be useful when a field has either ignored Mormonism in the past, or underutilized elements of the Mormon tradition.

These essays work best when they approach the topic from a broad angle, often raising more questions than they provide answers. They do not need to be grounded in primary research, but they should be conversant with relevant scholarly literature. They may use particular books, articles, or Mormon material as case studies, but should not be narrow enough to be confused with a book review, or even a review essay. 

The two primary audiences for the disciplinary essays are, first, scholars within the field under examination, and second, scholars who are involved in adjacent fields. Reaching the latter audience will require the author to briefly explain the traditional parameters and methods of the field in question.

Disciplinary essays should be between 3,000 and 4,000 words, including notes. Because of space limitations, we expect authors to stay within their word allotment. Deviations from the suggested word count should be preauthorized by the Review editorial staff.

BOOK REVIEWS:
Book reviews are typically focused on a single work, though at times it may be appropriate to include several books in a joint review. Our criteria for choosing books for review—content, method, perspective, originality, and significance—are evolving and flexible. Most reviews are solicited, though we are open, on a limited basis, to considering unsolicited submissions. Interested authors should contact the Mormon Studies Review staff to explore possible book reviews.

A book review should attempt a comprehensive analysis of the work (or works) in question. It should examine the strength of the work’s arguments, originality, and place within broader literature. Because Review readers come from many backgrounds and disciplines, authors should prioritize clear explanation of the strengths and significance of the books they review.

Book reviews should be between 1,500 and 2,000 words, including notes, if there are any; reviews of a single monograph should tend toward the former limitation, and reviews of edited collections or multiple books should tend toward the latter. Because of space limitations, we expect authors to stay within their word allotment. Deviations from the suggested word count should be preauthorized by the Review editorial staff.

At the top of the manuscript include information for the book(s) under review, as in this example:
Richard Lyman Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005. 740 pp., with sources cited and index. $35.00 hardcover, $18.95 paperback.
When quoting directly from the book(s) under review, cite the page numbers in parentheses following the quotation or at the end of the sentence and before the period. When citing other works, include reference information in footnotes formatted according to the most recent edition of The Chicago Manual of Style. Please keep footnotes to a minimum. Use italics rather than underlining for emphasis and for titles of works to be set in italic type.

REVIEWS OF RESOURCES AND PRIMARY SOURCES:
Reviews of resources and primary sources are typically focused on a single item, though at times it may be appropriate to include several books or other sources in a joint review. A review of a resource or primary source should orient Review readers to the source and consider the source’s strengths and weaknesses, particularly for use in research and classroom teaching. Because Review readers come from many background and disciplines, authors should prioritize clear explanation of the strengths and significance of the sources they review.
Reviews of resources and primary sources should be approximately 1,000 words, including notes, if there are any; when the review includes multiple sources, authors should negotiate a higher word limit with Review editorial staff well in advance of submitting a first draft.

At the top of the manuscript include information for the source(s) under review. For books, follow the example given above for book reviews; for other types of sources, please consult with Review editorial staff.

When quoting directly from the source(s) under review, use in-text parenthetical citations following the quotation or at the end of the sentence and before the period. When citing other works, include reference information in footnotes formatted according to the most recent edition of The Chicago Manual of Style. Please keep footnotes to a minimum. Use italics rather than underlining for emphasis and for titles of works to be set in italic type.

 

 

Related Titles

previous book next book
Lost Legacy - Cover
Lost Legacy

The Mormon Office of Presiding Patriarch

Irene M. Bates and E. Gary Smith

Pacific Apostle - Cover
Pacific Apostle

The 1920-21 Diary of David O. McKay in the Latter-day Saint Island Missions

David O. McKay Edited by Reid L. Neilson and Carson V. Teuscher

Return to the City of Joseph - Cover
Return to the City of Joseph

Modern Mormonism's Contest for the Soul of Nauvoo

Scott C. Esplin

The Mormon Tabernacle Choir - Cover
The Mormon Tabernacle Choir

A Biography

Michael Hicks

Prophetic Authority - Cover
Prophetic Authority

Democratic Hierarchy and the Mormon Priesthood

Michael Hubbard MacKay

Thunder from the Right - Cover
Thunder from the Right

Ezra Taft Benson in Mormonism and Politics

Edited by Matthew L. Harris

Restless Pilgrim - Cover
Restless Pilgrim

Andrew Jenson’s Quest for Latter-day Saint History

Reid L. Neilson and Scott D. Marianno

Baring Witness - Cover
Baring Witness

36 Mormon Women Talk Candidly about Love, Sex, and Marriage

Edited by Holly Welker

Vardis Fisher - Cover
Vardis Fisher

A Mormon Novelist

Michael Austin