Daniel J. Myers expresses concern in the The Chronicle of Higher Education about his popularity as a peer reviewer.

In the past month, I have been asked to review not one (which would be reasonable), or two (understandable), or three (excessive), four, five, six, or even seven manuscripts for publication, but indeed, a total of eight! While I confess to no small amount of pride in becoming what must be my discipline’s pre-eminent arbiter of scholarly quality and its gatekeeper supreme, I really must object. It’s getting impossible to produce any of my own work because I’m spending so much time assessing others’. And so far I’m only tallying journal manuscripts.

Comments are closed.