Cover for daniel: Caribbean and Atlantic Diaspora Dance: Igniting Citizenship. Click for larger imageIn December 2011 the University of Illinois Press published Caribbean and Atlantic Diaspora Dance: Igniting Citizenship by Yvonne Daniel, professor emerita of dance and Afro-American studies at Smith College.  Here Professor Daniel discusses the origination of the rumba and the impact of tourism on dance culture.

Q:  What cultures or groups dominate the Caribbean?

A:  The culture of the Caribbean is distinctly “Caribbean” or “Creole,” which means it is a combination of European and African cultures mainly, but in some islands, that combination is additionally mixed with Asian and American Indian peoples.  Those combinations make it unique as (an “American”) culture sphere, but its European and African legacies are the ones that predominate historically from the 15-19th centuries and which make it “Caribbean.”  More recently, Chinese in Cuba, Javanese in Suriname, East Indians and Pakistanis in Trinidad and Tobago reveal the important Asian input within Caribbean culture.  Also, in some parts of the Caribbean, American Indian culture has blended into the mix, but these areas are limited today to Dominica and St. Vincent, and parts of Central America- like Belize and Honduras.  Over time, the Caribbean islands have had African-derived populations as the dominant group, but on some islands and mainland territories like Guyana, the East Indian populations have taken or almost taken the majority.

Q:  Where did dances like the quadrille and rumba originate, and how did they spread throughout the region?

A:  Quadrilles came from various European countries with colonization, but the European forms shifted and incorporated changes from local islands that made them distinct from their European antecedents.  Rumba, on the other hand, is a new, Creole innovation; it developed as the combination of cultures (again mainly European and African) gelled in the 19th century, i.e., as distinct Cuban culture.  The spread of both dance forms is different as well.  Quadrilles spread with each European group that settled in each island and until the early 20th century, very often islanders did not share their Quadrille variations.  Rumba music spread significantly from Cuba in the 1930s and 40s, to other islands and throughout the world with the development of the record and movie industries and with World Fair performances.  The original and most “traditional” rumba dancing lingered in African zones of Cuba until the late 20th century.

Q:  What are the most dominant dances of the Diaspora?

A:  This is hard to say because it depends on who is talking, where in the Diaspora we are focused, during which time period, and it also depends on the definition of Diaspora. For example, are there more types of social and popular dances than there are concert or tourist forms?   And if we are in the US, which do you think are the dominant dances?  We could say that right now Dominican and Haitian forms of merengue and Cuban and Puerto Rican salsa are performed most often by most Caribbean peoples, but a decade or so before, French Caribbean zouk was just as popular.  Additionally, in terms of taste, many non-specialists would say that Jamaican Reggae was “the most” popular dance from the Caribbean.

I prefer to say that there are many genres of Diaspora dance performance and no one genre dominates—because dance and dance music are critical in African-derived or African-influenced cultures. Thus, whether we examine the period of enslavement or today’s dance scene, OR whether we are in Martinique or Cuba, there are examples of several if not most dance genres present.

Q:  What sort of dilemmas confront dance in the Caribbean?

A:  In terms of survival, Caribbean dance seems to manage whatever is put in front of it, i.e., Caribbean peoples will dance no matter what, so the survival of Caribbean dance is assured with human survival.  Still, health concerns and economic security, religious persecution and political restrictions all impact Caribbean dance genres, particularly in the tourist setting.  Because tourism is the central economic resource for most Caribbean nations, dance performance is entangled in economic decisions and conditions.  Courageous, inventive, but also intimidating body responses while dancing in popular, public settings have pierced political discussions in Cuba, Jamaica, Trinidad, Guyana, etc.  And, the stigma of “African superstitious religions” still remains despite the beauty and intrigue of sacred dance performance throughout the Caribbean. Thus, dance—like other cultural elements—is affected by all sorts of economic, political, religious, and social dilemmas; however what most people do not factor is how dance performance can assist economic programs that support Caribbean nations and how much expertise is ignored or wasted among dance performers and choreographers who know how to structure dance performances and enhance socio-economic possibilities.

Q:  What countries served as some of the biggest influences for dance?

A:  In the Caribbean, I would not hesitate to claim that Cuba has had some of the biggest influence in dance practices and dance performance in all the Americas.  I would also quickly add Puerto Rico as another seminal country in terms of huge importance of dance.  First, Cuba has been able to guard and support the existence of more distinct styles and forms of dance than any other Caribbean locale.  Puerto Rico, on the other hand, has been central to Caribbean stylization and dance music development since the late 18th century.  I also select these nations first because the dance forms that they have originated and developed hold interest in a way that other Caribbean dances, do not.  Spanish Caribbean dance is decorated and embellished by rhythms that allow all body parts to dance; it is more complex than other Caribbean dances that are based on simple, uncomplicated although embellished also, walking steps. Continue reading

Cover for Eller: Becoming Ray Bradbury. Click for larger imageLocus, the Magazine of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Field, has released its list of nominees for the 42nd annual Locus Awards.  Jonathan Eller’s critically acclaimed Becoming Ray Bradbury has been nominated in the Best Nonfiction Book category.

Michael Dirda from the Washington Post wrote, “every page is packed with fascinating material about one of this country’s most beloved writers,” and Library Journal said Becoming Ray Bradbury is “highly recommended not just for Bradbury fans but for all students of science fiction.”

To vote for Becoming Ray Bradbury access Locus’ online form here.

Cover for raubicheck: Scripting Hitchcock: Psycho, The Birds, and Marnie. Click for larger imageFollowing Scripting Hitchcock‘s nomination for an Edgar Award, authors Walter Raubicheck and Walter Srebnick discuss their interest in Psycho, The Birds, and Marnie, and reveal their favorite Hitchcock films.

Q:  Scripting Hitchcock focuses on three of Hitchcock’s later films.  Why did you choose Psycho, The Birds, and Marnie for your analysis?

A:  They were produced at the height of Hitchcock’s popularity, commercial success, and critical reputation and include his two best-known films—Psycho and The Birds—and the film that marks the end of his last great period as a filmmaker—Marnie. They were written by three young screenwriters, each of whom was new to Hollywood, and each of whom worked on the last of the three films: Marnie.

Q:  Was Hitchcock’s general source material consistent throughout his directing career or did he draw from many different kinds of artistic and literary sources?

A:  Like most of his films throughout his career, these three were based on popular contemporary literary works—two novels (Psycho, Marnie) and a novella (The Birds). He occasionally turned to plays (I Confess, Dial M for Murder), and once (The Wrong Man) to an actual true-life story.

Q:  Psycho’s shower scene is one of the most famous in all of cinema.  How did the dialogue or blocking change—if at all—from the screenplay to the screen?

A:  The physical and visual construction of that scene was unprecedented in the history of film in its tight planning, sequencing, and intensity. Hitchcock worked it out in minute detail with his pictorial consultant, his crew, and his cast.  But what happens in the scene was already quite evident in Joseph Stefano’s screenplay.

Q:  Were any of the screenwriters initially skeptical about speaking with you for the book?

A:  No.  They were eager to talk with us, felt that our project was interesting and worthwhile, and seemed to see it as a way to be acknowledged for their contribution to these three classic films.

Q:  Did Hitchcock have a different working relationship with female screenwriters than male screenwriters?

A:  Actually of our three writers, he had the closest relationship with the one woman, Jay Presson Allen, who wrote Marnie. He felt she brought a woman’s point of view to a film which focused on a female protagonist. She and Hitchcock became fast friends and their relationship lasted until the end of his life.

Q:  What was the most interesting thing that you learned in researching Scripting Hitchcock?

A:  How important the screenwriter was in collaboration with Hitchcock, and how important the director was in the writing process.  He was, in many ways, a co-writer. While they wrote all the dialogue and directions, and he subsequently directed the film, they worked closely together in shaping the narrative and characters at the heart of the film. He relied on them heavily and, considered them co-creators of the film, even when he was reluctant to admit it.

Q:  Do you have a favorite Hitchcock film?

Walter Raubicheck:  Rear Window, North by Northwest
Walter Srebnick:  Vertigo, Psycho

I was pleased to read in Shelf Awareness this morning that Book Expo America is considering adding a public component to the show in 2013.  The general public’s access to the trade show floor would bring new life to the event.  I’ve advocated this for years, or at least in multiple blog posts over the past 10 months.  Good to know someone was reading!

Charlie Thompson signs books at the University of Illinois Press booth, BEA 2011.

Cover for ferguson: Illinois in the War of 1812. Click for larger imageOn February 27, 2012, we will publish Gillum Ferguson’s book Illinois in the War of 1812.  Throughout this bicentennial year Ferguson will travel to museums, libraries, bookstores, and historical societies across the State of Illinois to share his knowledge of the War.  Below he discusses who won and why we should care.

Q:  What prompted the writing of this book? 

 A:  When doing research for an article about an early settler, I discovered that, aside from a long journal article in 1904, nobody had ever attempted to tell the whole story of what had happened in Illinois during the War of 1812.  I set out to write the book I was looking for, and in so doing discovered that there was much good material that no previous historian had brought to light.  My objectives were twofold: first, to determine what had happened and, second, to be fair to both sides in the conflict.

Q:  What was the War of 1812, and why should we care about it?

A:  Sometimes the war used to be called the “Second War of American Independence,” and it wasn’t a bad name.  Although the Revolution established the independence of the U.S. in the minds of Americans, the powers of Europe, especially Great Britain, but also Napoleonic France, still viewed the country with a colonialist mentality. They felt free, when it suited them, to interfere with American commerce, to pluck sailors off U.S. flag ships in international and even in U.S. waters, to occupy forts on U.S. soil, to tamper with the Indian tribes, and to engage in the Indian fur trade as if the U.S.-Canada did not exist.  In the War of 1812 the new nation proved to the world that it could be pushed only so far before it would fight and that it would fight to protect its rights as an independent nation.

Q:  Who won the War of 1812?

A:  That is a question that historians still argue about, and the answer depends on your definition.  On land, the British won more victories but the U.S. clearly won the biggest battle of the war, the Battle of New Orleans, which destroyed a veteran British army sent to invade the South. By sea, Americans won spectacular victories, but numbers told, so eventually the Royal Navy clamped a blockade on our coast that the U.S. was unable to break. At the end of the war the British controlled Northern Michigan, Wisconsin, Eastern Maine, and points along the New York border, but the U.S. controlled the lower Great Lakes and parts of Ontario, including the British stronghold of Malden (Amherstburg).  The peace treaty didn’t eliminate any of the abuses that had led the U.S. to declare war, but the British never renewed them.

Q:  What was the role of the war in the history of Illinois?

A:  At the outbreak of war, Illinois was a newly-organized territory with a non-Indian population of a little over 12,000.  Most of those few settlers were engaged in subsistence farming within about twenty miles of the Wabash, Ohio, and lower Mississippi Rivers. The population of the Indians was probably little more than that of the Americans and was concentrated in the northern half of the state. By 1818 Illinois was populous enough and confident enough to seek and obtain admission as a state.  Two major events had brought about that transformation: the War of 1812 and the sale of the public lands, but it was the first that made the second possible.

Q:  What was the position of Chicago in 1812?

A:  Chicago sat on a major travel route between the Great Lakes and the Illinois River system.  Fort Dearborn guarded that route.  It was garrisoned by about fifty-four soldiers and outside the fort was a tiny civilian community, consisting of a few small farmers, some Indian traders, and a few discharged soldiers.  All around them were the Potawatomi Indians, most of them friendly enough, but every year growing less so.  Mail came from Fort Wayne once a month, but otherwise Fort Dearborn was so remote and so isolated that Illinois governor Ninian Edwards wasn’t even sure whether it lay in his territory.

Q:  What happened in Chicago when war broke out?

A:  On August 15, 1812, the men, women, and children of Chicago marched out of the gates of Fort Dearborn and into a massacre.  With the outbreak of war, most of the tiny American community attempted to evacuate to Fort Wayne and then to Detroit.  They were less than two miles from the fort when their escort of supposedly friendly Potawatomi attacked them. Out of a party of just under 100 Americans, over half the soldiers, twelve out of thirteen civilian men, two women, and twelve children were killed in the attack.  The surviving troops surrendered with a promise that their lives would be spared, but the wounded were killed immediately and the rest of the prisoners were distributed among the Indian bands that had taken part in the attack. Many of the prisoners were treated cruelly and quite a few of them died before they could be ransomed.

Cover for raubicheck: Scripting Hitchcock: Psycho, The Birds, and Marnie. Click for larger imageWe are excited to announce that the recently published University of Illinois Press book Scripting Hitchcock: Psycho, The Birds, and Marnie by Walter Raubicheck and Walter Srebnick has been nominated for an Edgar Allan Poe Award in the Best Critical/Biographical category. 

This prestigious award honors the best in mystery fiction, nonfiction, and television, as recognized each year by the Mystery Writers of America.

The Edgar winners will be announced in a ceremony at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in New York City on April 26, 2012.

Congratulations to Walter and Walter on the nomination.

This morning’s New York Times has sort of a scattered article on the prospects of a post-bookstore environment for readers and publishers. Just as indie book stores were decimated by the chain stores, so now chain stores have largely fallen to online retailers, by which of course we mean Amazon. Did you know that Amazon.com is valued at $88 billion? I didn’t. By comparison, press.uillinois.edu is worth $39,137.

Barnes & Noble is the last of the chain stores, and it seems to be a toss up whether it too will go out of business or mutate into some sort of book-less Internet cafe thing. Meanwhile, Amazon has cast its gaze on a new object of interest: the publishers themselves, what CEO Jeff Bezos refers to as the middleman in the book selling business. Shiver.

Cover for armfield: Eugene Kinckle Jones: The National Urban League and Black Social Work, 1910-1940. Click for larger imageEugene Kinckle Jones (1885–1954) is an underknown figure in American history, but he was instrumental in professionalizing black social work in America. Author Felix L. Armfield discusses his discovery of Jones and the writing of Eugene Kinckle Jones: The National Urban League and Black Social Work, 1910-1940.

Q:  What was Eugene Kinckle Jones’s role in combating racial discrimination in the United States during the early 20th century?

A:  Eugene Kinckle Jones, while serving as the executive secretary of the National Urban League, worked to secure adequate jobs and housing for newly arriving southern black migrants to the often urban north. In addition to jobs and housing, Jones continually worked with industry to make sure that sufficient job opportunities were made available to urban black people from 1916 to 1940. Given the industries’ black quota hiring standards, this made Jones’ job even more difficult at times.

Q:  How did he come to work for the National Urban League?

A:  Jones was invited to join the work of the National Urban League in 1911 by the then executive secretary George Edmund Haynes. Haynes invited Jones to join him at the national office in New York to help carry out the growing work load. Haynes and Jones met each other in Louisville, Kentucky, which is where Jones had settled after completing his education at Cornell University. Soon after Jones joined the Urban League as a field secretary he was named Executive Secretary in 1916 as Haynes moved on to develop the work of training black social work students at Fisk University in Nashville, Tennessee.

Q:  Who did he look up to during his formative years?

A:  Jones grew up in the all-black historic ward of Jackson in Richmond, Virginia. Jackson Ward was home to some of Richmond’s most noted black citizens–the Jones family included. Jones looked up to such personalities as Maggie Lena Walker, the first woman to own and operate a bank in the country. He also looked up to such persons as John W. Mitchell, the owner and publisher of Richmond’s black newspaper the Planet, and a host of other individuals who inhabited all black Jackson Ward. In addition, both of Jones’ parents were college educated and played a very significant role in the life of young Jones and his community.

Q:  Did Civil Rights leaders of the ‘50s and ‘60s cite Jones as an influence? 

A:  Until now Jones was most likely a footnote. Scholars and activist of the ’50s and ’60s certainly were aware of the work he had done by making the National Urban League a mainstay in urban life. However other forces and personalities had moved on to the national scene with the ’50s and ’60s being the groundswell of Civil Rights activity.

Q:  When did you first discover the achievements of Eugene Kinckle Jones?

A:  I first encountered Eugene Kinckle Jones when I pledged the fraternity for which he is a jewel (founding member). I only knew of Jones’ activities with the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity which he helped to found at Cornell University in 1906. It wasn’t until my dissertation advisor insisted that I take a look at the Urban League papers and obtain my topic for the dissertation. I approached the project with much trepidation and did not initially have any desire to do such a research undertaking. But being a good graduate student I knew it best if I wanted to obtain my Ph. D. I had best follow my mentor and advisor, Dr. Darlene Clark Hine’s advice. After all, she was only the most sought after black historian in the country at the time–second only to Dr. John Hope Franklin. Needless to say, I acquiesced. There Eugene Kinckle Jones awaited me–completely hidden in plain view. The history of the Urban League itself is immediately visible but not so of its leader and pilot–Jones.

Q:  Why do you think that he has remained under the radar for so long?

A:  Eugene Kinckle Jones has remained under the radar until now largely because of the leadership of Whitney Young, Jr. Young took over at the helm of the Urban League in 1960 just as the Civil Rights Movement gained momentum. Jones had built the Urban League into a non-confrontational organization and some had questioned whether it was useful enough for civil rights agitation. Young’s tenure as leader of the Urban League would throw the support of the Urban League into full use as a civil rights organization. It was during Young’s administration that the Urban League gained its place in the annals of civil rights legends.

Q:  What was the most interesting thing that you learned in researching the book?

A:  While researching this book, which started out as a dissertation, there have been numerous discoveries. The greatest discovery was the vigilance with which Eugene Kinckle Jones fought for the work of the League and the very significant role he played in the establishment of social work throughout the country. So one of my greatest discoveries was indeed the history of black social work and how social work for black people came to be. Social work for black people rose alongside the Great Black Migration to the urban north. It is this history that promises to enrich our understand of the black migration. It was Jones who stepped in to get the greatest usefulness out of the newly established National Urban League.

Cover for caps: Henry Mancini: Reinventing Film Music. Click for larger imageThe Turner Classic Movies site has published a sparkling review of John Caps’s forthcoming book Henry Mancini: Reinventing Film Music.

“Caps traces Mancini’s collaborations with important directors and shows how he homed in on specific dramatic or comic aspects of the film to create musical effects through clever instrumentation, eloquent musical gestures, and meaningful resonances and continuities in his scores. Accessible and engaging, this fresh view of Mancini’s oeuvre and influence will delight and inform fans of film and popular music.”

Henry Mancini will be published in March 2012.

Cover for ramsay: Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Click for larger imageIn a January 23, 2012, New York Times Opinionator column on digital humanities, Stanley Fish explores Stephen Ramsay’s new book Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism.

“At times [Ramsay] argues that however alien algorithmic criticism may seem, it is really a technologically ramped up version of what literary criticism has always been. Although the rhetoric of traditional literary criticism emphasizes getting at the truth about a text as its end point, in practice what critics do is try out one hypothesis, and then another, and in the process re-characterize or deform the text.