Mormon Studies Review

Editor: Quincy D. Newell and Benjamin E. Park

DETAILS

Current Volume: 9 (2022)
Issued Annually (Spring)
ISSN: 2156-8022
eISSN: 2156-8030

About

The Mormon Studies Review (Review) tracks the vibrant, varied, and international academic engagement with Mormon institutions, lives, ideas, texts, and stories. It chronicles and assesses the developing field of Mormon studies with review essays, book reviews, and roundtable discussions related to the academic study of Mormonism. The Review offers scholars and interested non-specialists a one-stop source for discussions of current scholarship on Mormonism, ranging across disciplines and gathering voices from a broad cross-section of the academy, both LDS and non-LDS.


Indexes

Academic Search Alumni Edition, Academic Search Complete, Academic Search Elite, Academic Search Premier, Academic Search Ultimate, TOC Premier


SUBSCRIPTION RATES

Individuals:
1 Year
 Institutions:
1 Year
Print Only
-
 Print Only
$61.00





Electronic Only
$20.00
 Electronic Only
$78.00





Print + Electronic
$35.00
 Print + Electronic
$92.00

(click here to subscribe)

Non-U.S. Postage: Canada/Mexico, $10.00; Other Non-U.S. Locations, $15.00

Single issues: $25.00


ONLINE + PRINT ADVERTISING

The print ad rates for all our titles can be found in the 2021 journals catalog/rate card.

Click here to download the PDF version

Editors

Co-Editors

  • Quincy D. Newell, Walcott-Bartlett Chair of Ethics and Christian Evidences and Professor of Religious Studies, Hamilton College
  • Benjamin E. Park, Assistant Professor of History, Sam Houston State University

Editorial Advisory Board

      Ian G. Barber, Associate Professor of Archaeology, University of Otago

      Elise Boxer, Associate Professor of History and Program Coordinator of Native American Studies, University of South Dakota

      Mary Campbell, Associate Professor of Art History, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

      Rachel Cope, Associate Professor of Church History and Doctrine, Brigham Young University

      P. Jane Hafen, Professor emerita, University of Nevada Las Vegas

      David J. Howlett, Mellon Visiting Assistant Professor of Religion, Smith College

      Melissa Wei-Tsing Inouye, Senior Lecturer in Asian Studies, University of Auckland

      Sara M. Patterson, Professor of Theological Studies, Hanover College

      Bernadette Rigal-Cellard, Professor emerita, Université Bordeaux Montaigne

      Cristina Rosetti, Independent Scholar

      Darron Smith, Instructor of Sociology, University of Memphis

      Mees Tielens, Independent Scholar

      David Walker, Associate Professor, University of California Santa Barbara

Submissions

Mormon Studies Review

Most contributions to the
Mormon Studies Review are solicited by its editors. The timetable and guidelines for each type of contribution (Forum Essays, Review Essays, Book Reviews, and Reviews of Resources and Primary Sources) are listed below. The editors are open, on a limited basis, to considering unsolicited submissions that match the Review’s intended quality and scope. Interested authors should send an email query to MormonStudiesReview@gmail.com.

TIMETABLE FOR ALL SUBMISSIONS

First drafts due: April 1

Manuscripts back to author: May 15

Final pre-copyediting drafts due: June 15

Issue Printed: January 1

GUIDELINES FOR ALL SUBMISSIONS

Manuscripts should be written in Microsoft Word (doc, docx) and follow the most recent edition of
The Chicago Manual of Style on capitalization, punctuation, hyphenation, numbers, quotations, and citations. For a detailed style guide, see MSR Style Guide July 2020.pdf

At the end of the essay, include a two- or three-sentence biographical blurb with your name, affiliation, and latest publication or work in progress.

Submit an electronic copy of the manuscript via email to MormonStudiesReview@gmail.com. It will then be reviewed by the Review editorial staff, and any substantive revisions will be negotiated with you at that time. Thereafter, your submission will be copyedited and sent back for your final approval.

The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not conform to the critical standards of the journal.

GUIDELINES FOR SPECIFIC TYPES OF SUBMISSIONS

FORUM ESSAYS:
Forum essays typically appear at the beginning of the Mormon Studies Review. They are designed to offer different, and at times competing, perspectives on a broader scholarly question. Contributions should offer sophisticated, nuanced, and provocative analysis that is drawn from the author’s background, outlook, and expertise. Authors are encouraged to be brief in their assessment of past work and particular examples so that most space can be dedicated to the field’s future and possibilities. Because each volume’s Forum aims to cover a single theme and there is bound to be overlap, we request that each contributor remain fairly close to the subtopic agreed upon with the Review staff. Contributions should include a brief title.

Forum essays should be between 3,000 and 3,500 words, including notes;
ideal contributions come to the point quickly and develop their discussion efficiently. While critical thinking is expected, original research for Forum Essays is not mandatory.

REVIEW ESSAYS:
Review essays are often, though not always, based on one or several related books that merit an in-depth discussion or that might serve as an entry point for broader analysis. Our criteria for choosing review essay topics—content, method, perspective, originality, and significance—are evolving and flexible. Most essays are solicited, though we are open, on a limited basis, to considering unsolicited submissions that match our intended quality and scope. Interested authors should contact the Mormon Studies Review editors to explore possible review topics.

Essays should offer both a thorough summary of the book or books in question, and a critical evaluation of them in the context of existing literature. Each essay should have a title that differs from the book(s) under review and that reflects the essay’s theme and approach. Because readers of the Review come from many disciplines and backgrounds, reviewers should make it a priority to clearly explain the book’s or books’ broader significance both inside and outside its/their subfield. In most cases, the book(s) under review should be used as a touchstone from which to engage broader issues or developments within the relevant discipline(s).

Review essays should be between 3,000 and 4,000 words, including notes;
reviews of a single monograph should tend toward the former limitation, and reviews of edited collections or multiple books should tend toward the latter. Because of space limitations, we expect authors to stay within their word allotment. Deviations from the suggested word count should be preauthorized by the Review editorial staff.

At the top of the manuscript, include the essay’s title, your name, and information for the book(s) under review, as in this example:

Your Name, Title of Essay; reviewing: (1) Richard Lyman Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005. 740 pp., with index. $35.00 hardcover, $18.95 paperback. (2) Reid L. Neilson and Terryl L. Givens, eds., Joseph Smith Jr.: Reappraisals after Two Centuries. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 284 pp., with index. $99.95 hardcover, $24.95 paperback.

When quoting directly from the book(s) under review, cite the page numbers in parentheses following the quotation or at the end of the sentence and before the period. When citing other works, include reference information in footnotes formatted according to the most recent edition of
The Chicago Manual of Style. Use italics rather than underlining for emphasis and for titles of works to be set in italic type.

DISCIPLINARY ESSAYS:
Disciplinary essays aim to accomplish one of two things: first, to assess the development of a disciplinary field, as viewed through the lens of how it treats Mormonism. This approach typically works when a field has frequently, if not always consistently, utilized themes or characters from Mormonism, which allows the scholar to trace the broader contours of the field’s development.

Second, the disciplinary essay may posit how a disciplinary field could integrate Mormonism, or Mormon themes, stories, or figures, into its studies in order to explore new ideas. This particular approach may be useful when a field has either ignored Mormonism in the past, or underutilized elements of the Mormon tradition.

These essays work best when they approach the topic from a broad angle, often raising more questions than they provide answers. They do not need to be grounded in primary research, but they should be conversant with relevant scholarly literature. They may use particular books, articles, or Mormon material as case studies, but should not be narrow enough to be confused with a book review, or even a review essay.

The two primary audiences for the disciplinary essays are, first, scholars within the field under examination, and second, scholars who are involved in adjacent fields. Reaching the latter audience will require the author to briefly explain the traditional parameters and methods of the field in question.

Disciplinary essays should be between 3,000 and 4,000 words, including notes
. Because of space limitations, we expect authors to stay within their word allotment. Deviations from the suggested word count should be preauthorized by the Review editorial staff.

BOOK REVIEWS:
Book reviews are typically focused on a single work, though at times it may be appropriate to include several books in a joint review. Our criteria for choosing books for review—content, method, perspective, originality, and significance—are evolving and flexible. Most reviews are solicited, though we are open, on a limited basis, to considering unsolicited submissions. Interested authors should contact the Mormon Studies Review staff to explore possible book reviews.

A book review should attempt a comprehensive analysis of the work (or works) in question. It should examine the strength of the work’s arguments, originality, and place within broader literature. Because Review readers come from many backgrounds and disciplines, authors should prioritize clear explanation of the strengths and significance of the books they review.

Book reviews should be between 1,500 and 2,000 words, including notes
, if there are any; reviews of a single monograph should tend toward the former limitation, and reviews of edited collections or multiple books should tend word the latter. Because of space limitations, we expect authors to stay within their word allotment. Deviations from the suggested word count should be preauthorized by the Review editorial staff.

At the top of the manuscript include information for the book(s) under review, as in this example:

Richard Lyman Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005. 740 pp., with sources cited and index. $35.00 hardcover, $18.95 paperback.

When quoting directly from the book(s) under review, cite the page numbers in parentheses following the quotation or at the end of the sentence and before the period. When citing other works, include reference information in footnotes formatted according to the most recent edition of
The Chicago Manual of Style. Please keep footnotes to a minimum. Use italics rather than underlining for emphasis and for titles of works to be set in italic type.

REVIEWS OF RESOURCES AND PRIMARY SOURCES:
Reviews of resources and primary sources are typically focused on a single item, though at times it may be appropriate to include several books or other sources in a joint review. A review of a resource or primary source should orient Review readers to the source and consider the source’s strengths and weaknesses, particularly for use in research and classroom teaching. Because Review readers come from many background and disciplines, authors should prioritize clear explanation of the strengths and significance of the sources they review.

Reviews of resources and primary sources should be approximately 1,000 words, including notes
, if there are any; when the review includes multiple sources, authors should negotiate a higher word limit with Review editorial staff well in advance of submitting a first draft.

At the top of the manuscript include information for the source(s) under review.

For books, follow the example given above for book reviews; for other types of sources, please consult with
Review editorial staff.When quoting directly from the source(s) under review, use in-text parenthetical citations following the quotation or at the end of the sentence and before the period. When citing other works, include reference information in footnotes formatted according to the most recent edition of The Chicago Manual of Style. Please keep footnotes to a minimum. Use italics rather than underlining for emphasis and for titles of works to be set in italic type.

 

Featured Articles



“Same-Sex Marriage?! What Next Polygamy?”: Mormonism in US Political Culture
K. Mohrman
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/mormstudrevi.8.2021.0057?refreqid=excelsior%3A2732deb3b21016082b0d809ffbb28f03

Mormons and Politics in New Zealand
Peter Lineham
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/mormstudrevi.8.2021.0036?refreqid=excelsior%3A5e89d21390cf3ea4ee9242d95da0bc3c

Global Mormonism in Political Context
Laurie F. Maffly-Kipp
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/mormstudrevi.8.2021.0023?refreqid=excelsior%3A526e1126e60fef02cfe1d4144560e43b

Margarito Bautista, Mexican Politics, and the Third Convention
Elisa Eastwood Pulido
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/mormstudrevi.8.2021.0048?refreqid=excelsior%3A83acf23499f91a79ed18fbb457df62e1

Does Being Liberal Push Some Members Out of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints?
Jana Riess and Benjamin Knoll
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/mormstudrevi.8.2021.0068?refreqid=excelsior%3Ad31523900287b9a5c64e4dde906f3ab5